Compare · head to head
NIB vs Tower
NIB ranks higher overall — 360 rank 92 vs 48.
Tower leads on Value (46 vs 38). NIB leads on Growth (63 vs 10), Safety (74 vs 66) and Sentiment (59 vs 36). The two are close on Quality.
Ranks as of 2026-06-12 · 1–100 vs true peers. Higher is better.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Profile | ||
| Country | Australia | New Zealand |
| Sector | Insurance | Insurance |
| Industry | Insurance | Insurance |
| Size | Medium | Small |
| ISIN | AU000000NHF0 | NZTWRE0011S2 |
| Last update | 2026-04-02 | 2026-04-02 |
| History | ||
| 360 (V1) since 2023 | ||
| Ranks | ||
| 360 | 92 | 48 |
| Value | 38 | 46 |
| Quality | 93 | 93 |
| Growth | 63 | 10 |
| Safety | 74 | 66 |
| Sentiment | 59 | 36 |
| Quality details | ||
| Profitability | NR | NR |
| Cash Truth | 29 | 59 |
NIB vs Heungkuk Fire & Marine InsuranceNIB vs Ping AnNIB vs China Life InsuranceNIB vs AIA GroupAdd a third stock →
Make Sense of the Ranks
Every rank runs 1–100 against true peers. Higher is always better.
360° View
1 · Watch OutGood· 100
Value
1 · ExpensiveGood Value· 100
Quality
1 · Weak FundamentalsHigh Quality· 100
Growth
1 · Tough TimesHigh Growth· 100
Safety
1 · High LeverageWell-Financed· 100
Sentiment
1 · SkepticismPositive· 100