Compare · head to head
AIA Group vs NIB
AIA Group ranks higher overall — 360 rank 100 vs 92.
NIB leads on Quality (93 vs 79). AIA Group leads on Growth (71 vs 63), Safety (90 vs 74) and Sentiment (90 vs 59). The two are close on Value.
Ranks as of 2026-06-12 · 1–100 vs true peers. Higher is better.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Profile | ||
| Country | Hong Kong SAR China | Australia |
| Sector | Insurance | Insurance |
| Industry | Insurance | Insurance |
| Size | Large | Medium |
| ISIN | HK0000069689 | AU000000NHF0 |
| Last update | 2026-04-02 | 2026-04-02 |
| History | ||
| 360 (V1) since 2023 | ||
| Ranks | ||
| 360 | 100 | 92 |
| Value | 38 | 38 |
| Quality | 79 | 93 |
| Growth | 71 | 63 |
| Safety | 90 | 74 |
| Sentiment | 90 | 59 |
| Quality details | ||
| Profitability | NR | NR |
| Cash Truth | 56 | 29 |
AIA Group vs Ping AnAIA Group vs Tongyang Life InsuranceAIA Group vs Heungkuk Fire & Marine InsuranceAIA Group vs Samsung Life InsuranceAdd a third stock →
Full analyses: AIA Group · NIB
Make Sense of the Ranks
Every rank runs 1–100 against true peers. Higher is always better.
360° View
1 · Watch OutGood· 100
Value
1 · ExpensiveGood Value· 100
Quality
1 · Weak FundamentalsHigh Quality· 100
Growth
1 · Tough TimesHigh Growth· 100
Safety
1 · High LeverageWell-Financed· 100
Sentiment
1 · SkepticismPositive· 100