Compare · head to head
Chiyoda vs MAAS
Chiyoda ranks higher overall — 360 rank 89 vs 25.
Chiyoda leads on Value (80 vs 31), Quality (66 vs 49) and Safety (66 vs 31). MAAS leads on Growth (62 vs 45) and Sentiment (50 vs 38).
Ranks as of 2026-06-12 · 1–100 vs true peers. Higher is better.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Profile | ||
| Country | Japan | Australia |
| Sector | Construction & Engineering | Construction & Engineering |
| Industry | Construction & Engineering | Construction & Engineering |
| Size | Medium | Medium |
| ISIN | JP3528600004 | AU0000118564 |
| Last update | 2026-04-02 | 2026-04-02 |
| History | ||
| 360 (V1) since 2023 | ||
| Ranks | ||
| 360 | 89 | 25 |
| Value | 80 | 31 |
| Quality | 66 | 49 |
| Growth | 45 | 62 |
| Safety | 66 | 31 |
| Sentiment | 38 | 50 |
| Quality details | ||
| Profitability | 92 | 54 |
| Cash Truth | 40 | 44 |
Chiyoda vs MonadelphousChiyoda vs KindenChiyoda vs ChudenkoChiyoda vs Nippon Densetsu KogyoAdd a third stock →
Make Sense of the Ranks
Every rank runs 1–100 against true peers. Higher is always better.
360° View
1 · Watch OutGood· 100
Value
1 · ExpensiveGood Value· 100
Quality
1 · Weak FundamentalsHigh Quality· 100
Growth
1 · Tough TimesHigh Growth· 100
Safety
1 · High LeverageWell-Financed· 100
Sentiment
1 · SkepticismPositive· 100