Compare · head to head
Chiyoda vs Monadelphous
Chiyoda ranks higher overall — 360 rank 89 vs 81.
Chiyoda leads on Value (80 vs 31). Monadelphous leads on Growth (72 vs 45) and Sentiment (48 vs 38). The two are close on Quality and Safety.
Ranks as of 2026-06-12 · 1–100 vs true peers. Higher is better.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Profile | ||
| Country | Japan | Australia |
| Sector | Construction & Engineering | Construction & Engineering |
| Industry | Construction & Engineering | Construction & Engineering |
| Size | Medium | Medium |
| ISIN | JP3528600004 | AU000000MND5 |
| Last update | 2026-04-02 | 2026-04-02 |
| History | ||
| 360 (V1) since 2023 | ||
| Ranks | ||
| 360 | 89 | 81 |
| Value | 80 | 31 |
| Quality | 66 | 65 |
| Growth | 45 | 72 |
| Safety | 66 | 66 |
| Sentiment | 38 | 48 |
| Quality details | ||
| Profitability | 92 | 70 |
| Cash Truth | 40 | 61 |
Chiyoda vs MAASChiyoda vs KindenChiyoda vs ChudenkoChiyoda vs Nippon Densetsu KogyoAdd a third stock →
Full analyses: Chiyoda · Monadelphous
Make Sense of the Ranks
Every rank runs 1–100 against true peers. Higher is always better.
360° View
1 · Watch OutGood· 100
Value
1 · ExpensiveGood Value· 100
Quality
1 · Weak FundamentalsHigh Quality· 100
Growth
1 · Tough TimesHigh Growth· 100
Safety
1 · High LeverageWell-Financed· 100
Sentiment
1 · SkepticismPositive· 100