Compare · head to head
Equity Development Investment vs NIB
NIB ranks higher overall — 360 rank 92 vs 40.
Equity Development Investment leads on Value (63 vs 38). NIB leads on Quality (93 vs 26), Growth (63 vs 36) and Safety (74 vs 68).
Ranks as of 2026-06-12 · 1–100 vs true peers. Higher is better.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Profile | ||
| Country | Hong Kong SAR China | Australia |
| Sector | Insurance | Insurance |
| Industry | Insurance | Insurance |
| Size | Small | Medium |
| ISIN | ID1000074206 | AU000000NHF0 |
| Last update | 2026-04-02 | 2026-04-02 |
| History | ||
| 360 (V1) since 2023 | — | |
| Ranks | ||
| 360 | 40 | 92 |
| Value | 63 | 38 |
| Quality | 26 | 93 |
| Growth | 36 | 63 |
| Safety | 68 | 74 |
| Sentiment | NR | 59 |
| Quality details | ||
| Profitability | NR | NR |
| Cash Truth | 36 | 29 |
Equity Development Investment vs Lippo General InsuranceEquity Development Investment vs Samsung Life InsuranceEquity Development Investment vs Heungkuk Fire & Marine InsuranceEquity Development Investment vs AIA GroupAdd a third stock →
Full analyses: Equity Development Investment · NIB
Make Sense of the Ranks
Every rank runs 1–100 against true peers. Higher is always better.
360° View
1 · Watch OutGood· 100
Value
1 · ExpensiveGood Value· 100
Quality
1 · Weak FundamentalsHigh Quality· 100
Growth
1 · Tough TimesHigh Growth· 100
Safety
1 · High LeverageWell-Financed· 100
Sentiment
1 · SkepticismPositive· 100