Compare · head to head
Dong-Ah Geological Engineering vs Obayashi
Obayashi ranks higher overall — 360 rank 72 vs 45.
Obayashi leads on Value (65 vs 51), Safety (64 vs 43) and Sentiment (57 vs 48). Dong-Ah Geological Engineering leads on Quality (51 vs 45) and Growth (51 vs 41).
Ranks as of 2026-06-12 · 1–100 vs true peers. Higher is better.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Profile | ||
| Country | South Korea | Japan |
| Sector | Construction & Engineering | Construction & Engineering |
| Industry | Construction & Engineering | Construction & Engineering |
| Size | Small | X-Large |
| ISIN | KR7028100006 | JP3190000004 |
| Last update | 2026-04-02 | 2026-04-02 |
| History | ||
| 360 (V1) since 2023 | ||
| Ranks | ||
| 360 | 45 | 72 |
| Value | 51 | 65 |
| Quality | 51 | 45 |
| Growth | 51 | 41 |
| Safety | 43 | 64 |
| Sentiment | 48 | 57 |
| Quality details | ||
| Profitability | 48 | 41 |
| Cash Truth | 53 | 49 |
Dong-Ah Geological Engineering vs TodaDong-Ah Geological Engineering vs KajimaDong-Ah Geological Engineering vs TaiseiDong-Ah Geological Engineering vs Hazama AndoAdd a third stock →
Full analyses: Dong-Ah Geological Engineering · Obayashi
Make Sense of the Ranks
Every rank runs 1–100 against true peers. Higher is always better.
360° View
1 · Watch OutGood· 100
Value
1 · ExpensiveGood Value· 100
Quality
1 · Weak FundamentalsHigh Quality· 100
Growth
1 · Tough TimesHigh Growth· 100
Safety
1 · High LeverageWell-Financed· 100
Sentiment
1 · SkepticismPositive· 100