Compare · head to head
Australian Clinical Labs vs H.U. Group Holdings
H.U. Group Holdings ranks higher overall — 360 rank 83 vs 65.
Australian Clinical Labs leads on Quality (78 vs 65). H.U. Group Holdings leads on Growth (42 vs 26) and Safety (67 vs 45). The two are close on Value and Sentiment.
Ranks as of 2026-06-12 · 1–100 vs true peers. Higher is better.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Profile | ||
| Country | Australia | Japan |
| Sector | Health Care | Health Care |
| Industry | Health Care Providers & Services | Health Care Providers & Services |
| Size | Medium | Large |
| ISIN | AU0000148496 | JP3822000000 |
| Last update | 2026-04-02 | 2026-04-02 |
| History | ||
| 360 (V1) since 2023 | ||
| Ranks | ||
| 360 | 65 | 83 |
| Value | 68 | 64 |
| Quality | 78 | 65 |
| Growth | 26 | 42 |
| Safety | 45 | 67 |
| Sentiment | 48 | 46 |
| Quality details | ||
| Profitability | 75 | 53 |
| Cash Truth | 80 | 78 |
Australian Clinical Labs vs HealiusAustralian Clinical Labs vs Nihon KohdenAustralian Clinical Labs vs Prenetics GlobalAustralian Clinical Labs vs Apex BiotechnologyAdd a third stock →
Full analyses: Australian Clinical Labs · H.U. Group Holdings
Make Sense of the Ranks
Every rank runs 1–100 against true peers. Higher is always better.
360° View
1 · Watch OutGood· 100
Value
1 · ExpensiveGood Value· 100
Quality
1 · Weak FundamentalsHigh Quality· 100
Growth
1 · Tough TimesHigh Growth· 100
Safety
1 · High LeverageWell-Financed· 100
Sentiment
1 · SkepticismPositive· 100