Compare · head to head
Aprogen vs Mitsubishi Heavy
Mitsubishi Heavy ranks higher overall — 360 rank 70 vs 7.
Mitsubishi Heavy leads on Quality (49 vs 21), Safety (72 vs 38) and Sentiment (51 vs 41). The two are close on Value.
Ranks as of 2026-06-12 · 1–100 vs true peers. Higher is better.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Profile | ||
| Country | South Korea | Japan |
| Sector | Industrial Goods | Industrial Goods |
| Industry | Machinery | Machinery |
| Size | Small | XX-Large |
| ISIN | KR7007460009 | JP3900000005 |
| Last update | 2026-04-02 | 2026-04-02 |
| History | ||
| 360 (V1) since 2023 | ||
| Ranks | ||
| 360 | 7 | 70 |
| Value | 41 | 38 |
| Quality | 21 | 49 |
| Growth | NR | 61 |
| Safety | 38 | 72 |
| Sentiment | 41 | 51 |
| Quality details | ||
| Profitability | 5 | 25 |
| Cash Truth | 37 | 73 |
Aprogen vs OSGAprogen vs Japan Steel WorksAprogen vs Kaori Heat TreatmentAprogen vs FurukawaAdd a third stock →
Full analyses: Aprogen · Mitsubishi Heavy
Make Sense of the Ranks
Every rank runs 1–100 against true peers. Higher is always better.
360° View
1 · Watch OutGood· 100
Value
1 · ExpensiveGood Value· 100
Quality
1 · Weak FundamentalsHigh Quality· 100
Growth
1 · Tough TimesHigh Growth· 100
Safety
1 · High LeverageWell-Financed· 100
Sentiment
1 · SkepticismPositive· 100