Compare · head to head
Confluent vs Jamf Holding
Confluent ranks higher overall — 360 rank 11 vs 8.
Jamf Holding leads on Value (52 vs 33). Confluent leads on Safety (37 vs 23) and Sentiment (48 vs 39). The two are close on Quality.
Ranks as of 2026-06-12 · 1–100 vs true peers. Higher is better.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Profile | ||
| Country | USA | USA |
| Sector | Software & Internet | Software & Internet |
| Industry | Software | Software |
| Size | Large | Medium |
| ISIN | US20717M1036 | US47074L1052 |
| Last update | 2026-04-02 | 2026-04-02 |
| History | ||
| 360 (V1) since 2023 | ||
| Ranks | ||
| 360 | 11 | 8 |
| Value | 33 | 52 |
| Quality | 33 | 30 |
| Growth | NR | NR |
| Safety | 37 | 23 |
| Sentiment | 48 | 39 |
| Quality details | ||
| Profitability | 21 | 26 |
| Cash Truth | 44 | 34 |
Confluent vs AgilysysConfluent vs DynatraceConfluent vs Sprout SocialConfluent vs AvePointAdd a third stock →
Full analyses: Confluent · Jamf Holding
Make Sense of the Ranks
Every rank runs 1–100 against true peers. Higher is always better.
360° View
1 · Watch OutGood· 100
Value
1 · ExpensiveGood Value· 100
Quality
1 · Weak FundamentalsHigh Quality· 100
Growth
1 · Tough TimesHigh Growth· 100
Safety
1 · High LeverageWell-Financed· 100
Sentiment
1 · SkepticismPositive· 100