Compare · head to head
Mphasis vs Persistent Systems
Persistent Systems ranks higher overall — 360 rank 73 vs 69.
Mphasis leads on Value (40 vs 16). Persistent Systems leads on Quality (63 vs 56), Growth (77 vs 64) and Safety (68 vs 59). The two are close on Sentiment.
Ranks as of 2026-06-12 · 1–100 vs true peers. Higher is better.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Profile | ||
| Country | India | India |
| Sector | Software & Internet | Software & Internet |
| Industry | IT Services | IT Services |
| Size | Large | Large |
| ISIN | INE356A01018 | INE262H01021 |
| Last update | 2026-04-02 | 2026-04-02 |
| History | ||
| 360 (V1) since 2023 | ||
| Ranks | ||
| 360 | 69 | 73 |
| Value | 40 | 16 |
| Quality | 56 | 63 |
| Growth | 64 | 77 |
| Safety | 59 | 68 |
| Sentiment | 51 | 49 |
| Quality details | ||
| Profitability | 73 | 87 |
| Cash Truth | 39 | 39 |
Mphasis vs Tech MahindraMphasis vs COFORGEMphasis vs AltronMphasis vs Bluebik GroupAdd a third stock →
Full analyses: Mphasis · Persistent Systems
Make Sense of the Ranks
Every rank runs 1–100 against true peers. Higher is always better.
360° View
1 · Watch OutGood· 100
Value
1 · ExpensiveGood Value· 100
Quality
1 · Weak FundamentalsHigh Quality· 100
Growth
1 · Tough TimesHigh Growth· 100
Safety
1 · High LeverageWell-Financed· 100
Sentiment
1 · SkepticismPositive· 100