Compare · head to head
AUB Group vs TQM
TQM ranks higher overall — 360 rank 86 vs 58.
TQM leads on Value (40 vs 35), Quality (90 vs 64) and Safety (66 vs 28). AUB Group leads on Growth (66 vs 57) and Sentiment (74 vs 56).
Ranks as of 2026-06-12 · 1–100 vs true peers. Higher is better.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Profile | ||
| Country | Australia | Singapore |
| Sector | Insurance | Insurance |
| Industry | Insurance | Insurance |
| Size | Large | Small |
| ISIN | AU000000AUB9 | TH8878010Z01 |
| Last update | 2026-04-02 | 2026-04-02 |
| History | ||
| 360 (V1) since 2023 | ||
| Ranks | ||
| 360 | 58 | 86 |
| Value | 35 | 40 |
| Quality | 64 | 90 |
| Growth | 66 | 57 |
| Safety | 28 | 66 |
| Sentiment | 74 | 56 |
| Quality details | ||
| Profitability | NR | NR |
| Cash Truth | 56 | 65 |
AUB Group vs Steadfast GroupAUB Group vs Samsung Fire & Marine InsuranceAUB Group vs Dai-ichi Life InsuranceAUB Group vs Cathay FinancialAdd a third stock →
Full analyses: AUB Group · TQM
Make Sense of the Ranks
Every rank runs 1–100 against true peers. Higher is always better.
360° View
1 · Watch OutGood· 100
Value
1 · ExpensiveGood Value· 100
Quality
1 · Weak FundamentalsHigh Quality· 100
Growth
1 · Tough TimesHigh Growth· 100
Safety
1 · High LeverageWell-Financed· 100
Sentiment
1 · SkepticismPositive· 100