Compare · head to head
Klingelnberg vs Starrag
Starrag ranks higher overall — 360 rank 83 vs 18.
Klingelnberg leads on Value (66 vs 57). Starrag leads on Quality (57 vs 44), Growth (59 vs 32), Safety (64 vs 28) and Sentiment (48 vs 43).
Ranks as of 2026-06-12 · 1–100 vs true peers. Higher is better.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Profile | ||
| Country | Switzerland | Switzerland |
| Sector | Industrial Goods | Industrial Goods |
| Industry | Machinery | Machinery |
| Size | Small | Small |
| ISIN | CH0420462266 | CH0002361068 |
| Last update | 2026-04-02 | 2026-04-02 |
| History | ||
| 360 (V1) since 2023 | ||
| Ranks | ||
| 360 | 18 | 83 |
| Value | 66 | 57 |
| Quality | 44 | 57 |
| Growth | 32 | 59 |
| Safety | 28 | 64 |
| Sentiment | 43 | 48 |
| Quality details | ||
| Profitability | 43 | 44 |
| Cash Truth | 45 | 69 |
Klingelnberg vs DatronKlingelnberg vs RingmetallKlingelnberg vs Georg FischerKlingelnberg vs Maschinenfabrik Berthold HermleAdd a third stock →
Full analyses: Klingelnberg · Starrag
Make Sense of the Ranks
Every rank runs 1–100 against true peers. Higher is always better.
360° View
1 · Watch OutGood· 100
Value
1 · ExpensiveGood Value· 100
Quality
1 · Weak FundamentalsHigh Quality· 100
Growth
1 · Tough TimesHigh Growth· 100
Safety
1 · High LeverageWell-Financed· 100
Sentiment
1 · SkepticismPositive· 100