Compare · head to head
Bid vs Fraser & Neave Holdings
Bid ranks higher overall — 360 rank 79 vs 38.
Bid leads on Value (54 vs 41), Quality (51 vs 34), Growth (48 vs 34) and Safety (72 vs 65). Fraser & Neave Holdings leads on Sentiment (62 vs 54).
Ranks as of 2026-06-12 · 1–100 vs true peers. Higher is better.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Profile | ||
| Country | South Africa | Thailand |
| Sector | Stores & Online Retail | Food, Drinks & Tobacco |
| Industry | Food & Staples Retailing | Beverages |
| Size | X-Large | Large |
| ISIN | ZAE000216537 | MYL3689OO006 |
| Last update | 2026-04-02 | 2026-04-02 |
| History | ||
| 360 (V1) since 2023 | ||
| Ranks | ||
| 360 | 79 | 38 |
| Value | 54 | 41 |
| Quality | 51 | 34 |
| Growth | 48 | 34 |
| Safety | 72 | 65 |
| Sentiment | 54 | 62 |
| Quality details | ||
| Profitability | 73 | 40 |
| Cash Truth | 30 | 28 |
Full analyses: Bid · Fraser & Neave Holdings
Make Sense of the Ranks
Every rank runs 1–100 against true peers. Higher is always better.
360° View
1 · Watch OutGood· 100
Value
1 · ExpensiveGood Value· 100
Quality
1 · Weak FundamentalsHigh Quality· 100
Growth
1 · Tough TimesHigh Growth· 100
Safety
1 · High LeverageWell-Financed· 100
Sentiment
1 · SkepticismPositive· 100