Compare · head to head
MTU Aero Engines vs Safran
Safran ranks higher overall — 360 rank 98 vs 70.
Safran leads on Quality (68 vs 58), Growth (63 vs 31) and Safety (71 vs 66). The two are close on Value and Sentiment.
Ranks as of 2026-06-12 · 1–100 vs true peers. Higher is better.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Profile | ||
| Country | Germany | France |
| Sector | Industrial Goods | Industrial Goods |
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense |
| Size | X-Large | XX-Large |
| ISIN | DE000A0D9PT0 | FR0000073272 |
| Last update | 2026-04-02 | 2026-04-02 |
| History | ||
| 360 (V1) since 2023 | ||
| Ranks | ||
| 360 | 70 | 98 |
| Value | 70 | 71 |
| Quality | 58 | 68 |
| Growth | 31 | 63 |
| Safety | 66 | 71 |
| Sentiment | 47 | 45 |
| Quality details | ||
| Profitability | 66 | 89 |
| Cash Truth | NR | 47 |
MTU Aero Engines vs ELBIT SYSTEMSMTU Aero Engines vs TAT TechnologiesMTU Aero Engines vs SeniorMTU Aero Engines vs Dassault AviationAdd a third stock →
Full analyses: MTU Aero Engines · Safran
Make Sense of the Ranks
Every rank runs 1–100 against true peers. Higher is always better.
360° View
1 · Watch OutGood· 100
Value
1 · ExpensiveGood Value· 100
Quality
1 · Weak FundamentalsHigh Quality· 100
Growth
1 · Tough TimesHigh Growth· 100
Safety
1 · High LeverageWell-Financed· 100
Sentiment
1 · SkepticismPositive· 100