Compare · head to head
Energy Recovery vs Park-Ohio
Energy Recovery ranks higher overall — 360 rank 66 vs 51.
Energy Recovery leads on Quality (76 vs 47) and Safety (65 vs 32). Park-Ohio leads on Growth (64 vs 32) and Sentiment (64 vs 49). The two are close on Value.
Ranks as of 2026-06-12 · 1–100 vs true peers. Higher is better.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Profile | ||
| Country | USA | USA |
| Sector | Industrial Goods | Industrial Goods |
| Industry | Machinery | Machinery |
| Size | Small | Medium |
| ISIN | US29270J1007 | US7006661000 |
| Last update | 2026-04-02 | 2026-04-02 |
| History | ||
| 360 (V1) since 2023 | ||
| Ranks | ||
| 360 | 66 | 51 |
| Value | 45 | 43 |
| Quality | 76 | 47 |
| Growth | 32 | 64 |
| Safety | 65 | 32 |
| Sentiment | 49 | 64 |
| Quality details | ||
| Profitability | 76 | 49 |
| Cash Truth | 75 | 45 |
Energy Recovery vs Ingersoll RandEnergy Recovery vs ITTEnergy Recovery vs NordsonEnergy Recovery vs FlowserveAdd a third stock →
Full analyses: Energy Recovery · Park-Ohio
Make Sense of the Ranks
Every rank runs 1–100 against true peers. Higher is always better.
360° View
1 · Watch OutGood· 100
Value
1 · ExpensiveGood Value· 100
Quality
1 · Weak FundamentalsHigh Quality· 100
Growth
1 · Tough TimesHigh Growth· 100
Safety
1 · High LeverageWell-Financed· 100
Sentiment
1 · SkepticismPositive· 100