Compare · head to head
CTM vs Trip.com
Trip.com ranks higher overall — 360 rank 70 vs 36.
Trip.com leads on Value (62 vs 36) and Quality (49 vs 42). The two are close on Growth, Safety and Sentiment.
Ranks as of 2026-06-12 · 1–100 vs true peers. Higher is better.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Profile | ||
| Country | Australia | Singapore |
| Sector | Travel & Leisure | Travel & Leisure |
| Industry | Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure | Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure |
| Size | Medium | X-Large |
| ISIN | AU000000CTD3 | KYG9066F1019 |
| Last update | 2026-04-02 | 2026-04-02 |
| History | ||
| 360 (V1) since 2023 | ||
| Ranks | ||
| 360 | 36 | 70 |
| Value | 36 | 62 |
| Quality | 42 | 49 |
| Growth | 37 | 40 |
| Safety | 70 | 68 |
| Sentiment | 49 | 51 |
| Quality details | ||
| Profitability | 38 | 61 |
| Cash Truth | 45 | 36 |
CTM vs HanaTour ServiceCTM vs SerkoCTM vs Flight Centre TravelCTM vs Lotte Tour DevelopmentAdd a third stock →
Make Sense of the Ranks
Every rank runs 1–100 against true peers. Higher is always better.
360° View
1 · Watch OutGood· 100
Value
1 · ExpensiveGood Value· 100
Quality
1 · Weak FundamentalsHigh Quality· 100
Growth
1 · Tough TimesHigh Growth· 100
Safety
1 · High LeverageWell-Financed· 100
Sentiment
1 · SkepticismPositive· 100