Compare · head to head
First vs Mid Penn
Mid Penn ranks higher overall — 360 rank 81 vs 66.
First leads on Quality (71 vs 31). Mid Penn leads on Growth (76 vs 40), Safety (56 vs 44) and Sentiment (68 vs 51). The two are close on Value.
Ranks as of 2026-06-12 · 1–100 vs true peers. Higher is better.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Profile | ||
| Country | USA | USA |
| Sector | Banks | Banks |
| Industry | Banks | Banks |
| Size | X-Small | Small |
| ISIN | US31866P1021 | US59540G1076 |
| Last update | 2026-04-02 | 2026-04-02 |
| History | ||
| 360 (V1) since 2023 | ||
| Ranks | ||
| 360 | 66 | 81 |
| Value | 68 | 64 |
| Quality | 71 | 31 |
| Growth | 40 | 76 |
| Safety | 44 | 56 |
| Sentiment | 51 | 68 |
| Quality details | ||
| Profitability | NR | NR |
| Cash Truth | 89 | 59 |
First vs Broadway FinancialFirst vs Colony BankcorpFirst vs Peoples FinancialFirst vs First Guaranty BancsharesAdd a third stock →
Full analyses: First · Mid Penn
Make Sense of the Ranks
Every rank runs 1–100 against true peers. Higher is always better.
360° View
1 · Watch OutGood· 100
Value
1 · ExpensiveGood Value· 100
Quality
1 · Weak FundamentalsHigh Quality· 100
Growth
1 · Tough TimesHigh Growth· 100
Safety
1 · High LeverageWell-Financed· 100
Sentiment
1 · SkepticismPositive· 100