Compare · head to head
Dine Brands vs FAT Brands
Dine Brands ranks higher overall — 360 rank 13 vs 5.
Dine Brands leads on Quality (58 vs 34). The two are close on Value, Safety and Sentiment.
Ranks as of 2026-06-12 · 1–100 vs true peers. Higher is better.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Profile | ||
| Country | USA | USA |
| Sector | Travel & Leisure | Travel & Leisure |
| Industry | Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure | Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure |
| Size | Medium | Small |
| ISIN | US2544231069 | US30258N1054 |
| Last update | 2026-04-02 | 2026-04-02 |
| History | ||
| 360 (V1) since 2023 | ||
| Ranks | ||
| 360 | 13 | 5 |
| Value | 46 | 46 |
| Quality | 58 | 34 |
| Growth | 44 | NR |
| Safety | 14 | 12 |
| Sentiment | 42 | 44 |
| Quality details | ||
| Profitability | 59 | 19 |
| Cash Truth | 58 | 49 |
Dine Brands vs BrinkerDine Brands vs Texas RoadhouseDine Brands vs Bloomin' BrandsDine Brands vs Darden RestaurantsAdd a third stock →
Full analyses: Dine Brands · FAT Brands
Make Sense of the Ranks
Every rank runs 1–100 against true peers. Higher is always better.
360° View
1 · Watch OutGood· 100
Value
1 · ExpensiveGood Value· 100
Quality
1 · Weak FundamentalsHigh Quality· 100
Growth
1 · Tough TimesHigh Growth· 100
Safety
1 · High LeverageWell-Financed· 100
Sentiment
1 · SkepticismPositive· 100