Compare · head to head
AngioDynamics vs Becton Dickinson
AngioDynamics ranks higher overall — 360 rank 57 vs 32.
Becton Dickinson leads on Value (73 vs 53). AngioDynamics leads on Growth (46 vs 32), Safety (47 vs 26) and Sentiment (57 vs 46). The two are close on Quality.
Ranks as of 2026-06-12 · 1–100 vs true peers. Higher is better.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Profile | ||
| Country | USA | USA |
| Sector | Health Care | Health Care |
| Industry | Health Care Equipment & Supplies | Health Care Equipment & Supplies |
| Size | Small | XX-Large |
| ISIN | US03475V1017 | US0758871091 |
| Last update | 2026-04-02 | 2026-04-02 |
| History | ||
| 360 (V1) since 2023 | ||
| Ranks | ||
| 360 | 57 | 32 |
| Value | 53 | 73 |
| Quality | 55 | 54 |
| Growth | 46 | 32 |
| Safety | 47 | 26 |
| Sentiment | 57 | 46 |
| Quality details | ||
| Profitability | 50 | 30 |
| Cash Truth | 59 | 79 |
AngioDynamics vs LeMaitre VascularAngioDynamics vs Tactile Systems TechnologyAngioDynamics vs IntegerAngioDynamics vs Sight SciencesAdd a third stock →
Full analyses: AngioDynamics · Becton Dickinson
Make Sense of the Ranks
Every rank runs 1–100 against true peers. Higher is always better.
360° View
1 · Watch OutGood· 100
Value
1 · ExpensiveGood Value· 100
Quality
1 · Weak FundamentalsHigh Quality· 100
Growth
1 · Tough TimesHigh Growth· 100
Safety
1 · High LeverageWell-Financed· 100
Sentiment
1 · SkepticismPositive· 100