Compare · head to head
Chiba Bank vs NICE Information Service
NICE Information Service ranks higher overall — 360 rank 98 vs 24.
NICE Information Service leads on Value (65 vs 45), Quality (65 vs 18), Safety (69 vs 59) and Sentiment (57 vs 34). The two are close on Growth.
Ranks as of 2026-06-12 · 1–100 vs true peers. Higher is better.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Profile | ||
| Country | Japan | South Korea |
| Sector | Banks | Business Services |
| Industry | Banks | Professional Services |
| Size | Medium | Medium |
| ISIN | JP3511800009 | KR7030190003 |
| Last update | 2026-04-02 | 2026-04-02 |
| History | ||
| 360 (V1) since 2023 | ||
| Ranks | ||
| 360 | 24 | 98 |
| Value | 45 | 65 |
| Quality | 18 | 65 |
| Growth | 59 | 61 |
| Safety | 59 | 69 |
| Sentiment | 34 | 57 |
| Quality details | ||
| Profitability | NR | 83 |
| Cash Truth | 13 | 47 |
Chiba Bank vs Fukuoka FinancialChiba Bank vs Hokuhoku Financial GroupChiba Bank vs Hirogin HoldingsChiba Bank vs Hachijuni BankAdd a third stock →
Full analyses: Chiba Bank · NICE Information Service
Make Sense of the Ranks
Every rank runs 1–100 against true peers. Higher is always better.
360° View
1 · Watch OutGood· 100
Value
1 · ExpensiveGood Value· 100
Quality
1 · Weak FundamentalsHigh Quality· 100
Growth
1 · Tough TimesHigh Growth· 100
Safety
1 · High LeverageWell-Financed· 100
Sentiment
1 · SkepticismPositive· 100