Compare · head to head
Computershare vs Li Auto
Computershare ranks higher overall — 360 rank 77 vs 22.
Li Auto leads on Value (51 vs 37). Computershare leads on Quality (65 vs 28), Growth (47 vs 40) and Safety (75 vs 45). The two are close on Sentiment.
Ranks as of 2026-06-12 · 1–100 vs true peers. Higher is better.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Profile | ||
| Country | Australia | Hong Kong SAR China |
| Sector | Financial Services | Cars & Auto Parts |
| Industry | Consumer Finance | Automobiles |
| Size | Large | X-Large |
| ISIN | AU000000CPU5 | KYG5479M1050 |
| Last update | 2026-04-02 | 2026-04-02 |
| History | ||
| 360 (V1) since 2023 | ||
| Ranks | ||
| 360 | 77 | 22 |
| Value | 37 | 51 |
| Quality | 65 | 28 |
| Growth | 47 | 40 |
| Safety | 75 | 45 |
| Sentiment | 53 | 55 |
| Quality details | ||
| Profitability | 64 | 26 |
| Cash Truth | 66 | 29 |
Computershare vs Dongwon SystemsComputershare vs Chicony Power TechnologyComputershare vs TURVO InternationalComputershare vs Apex InternationalAdd a third stock →
Full analyses: Computershare · Li Auto
Make Sense of the Ranks
Every rank runs 1–100 against true peers. Higher is always better.
360° View
1 · Watch OutGood· 100
Value
1 · ExpensiveGood Value· 100
Quality
1 · Weak FundamentalsHigh Quality· 100
Growth
1 · Tough TimesHigh Growth· 100
Safety
1 · High LeverageWell-Financed· 100
Sentiment
1 · SkepticismPositive· 100