Compare · head to head
Challenger vs MS&AD Insurance
Challenger ranks higher overall — 360 rank 45 vs 16.
MS&AD Insurance leads on Value (74 vs 46). Challenger leads on Growth (60 vs 34), Safety (52 vs 36) and Sentiment (37 vs 16).
Ranks as of 2026-06-12 · 1–100 vs true peers. Higher is better.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Profile | ||
| Country | Australia | Japan |
| Sector | Financial Services | Insurance |
| Industry | Diversified Financial Services | Insurance |
| Size | Medium | Large |
| ISIN | AU000000CGF5 | JP3890310000 |
| Last update | 2026-04-02 | 2026-04-02 |
| History | ||
| 360 (V1) since 2023 | ||
| Ranks | ||
| 360 | 45 | 16 |
| Value | 46 | 74 |
| Quality | NR | 37 |
| Growth | 60 | 34 |
| Safety | 52 | 36 |
| Sentiment | 37 | 16 |
| Quality details | ||
| Profitability | NR | NR |
| Cash Truth | 66 | 41 |
Challenger vs Ping AnChallenger vs Hanwha General InsuranceChallenger vs SuncorpChallenger vs QBEAdd a third stock →
Full analyses: Challenger · MS&AD Insurance
Make Sense of the Ranks
Every rank runs 1–100 against true peers. Higher is always better.
360° View
1 · Watch OutGood· 100
Value
1 · ExpensiveGood Value· 100
Quality
1 · Weak FundamentalsHigh Quality· 100
Growth
1 · Tough TimesHigh Growth· 100
Safety
1 · High LeverageWell-Financed· 100
Sentiment
1 · SkepticismPositive· 100