Compare · head to head
eHealth vs Marsh & McLennan
eHealth ranks higher overall — 360 rank 56 vs 29.
eHealth leads on Value (75 vs 22) and Safety (68 vs 10). Marsh & McLennan leads on Quality (95 vs 44) and Sentiment (56 vs 36). The two are close on Growth.
Ranks as of 2026-06-12 · 1–100 vs true peers. Higher is better.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Profile | ||
| Country | USA | USA |
| Sector | Insurance | Insurance |
| Industry | Insurance | Insurance |
| Size | Medium | Medium |
| ISIN | US28238P1093 | US5717481023 |
| Last update | 2026-04-02 | 2026-04-02 |
| History | ||
| 360 (V1) since 2023 | ||
| Ranks | ||
| 360 | 56 | 29 |
| Value | 75 | 22 |
| Quality | 44 | 95 |
| Growth | 42 | 46 |
| Safety | 68 | 10 |
| Sentiment | 36 | 56 |
| Quality details | ||
| Profitability | NR | NR |
| Cash Truth | 23 | 73 |
eHealth vs GoHealtheHealth vs Unum GroupeHealth vs Globe LifeeHealth vs Reinsurance Group of AmericaAdd a third stock →
Full analyses: eHealth · Marsh & McLennan
Make Sense of the Ranks
Every rank runs 1–100 against true peers. Higher is always better.
360° View
1 · Watch OutGood· 100
Value
1 · ExpensiveGood Value· 100
Quality
1 · Weak FundamentalsHigh Quality· 100
Growth
1 · Tough TimesHigh Growth· 100
Safety
1 · High LeverageWell-Financed· 100
Sentiment
1 · SkepticismPositive· 100