Compare · head to head
Pick n Pay Stores vs SMU
Pick n Pay Stores ranks higher overall — 360 rank 19 vs 10.
SMU leads on Quality (42 vs 30). Pick n Pay Stores leads on Growth (53 vs 32) and Safety (29 vs 18). The two are close on Value and Sentiment.
Ranks as of 2026-06-12 · 1–100 vs true peers. Higher is better.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Profile | ||
| Country | South Africa | Chile |
| Sector | Stores & Online Retail | Stores & Online Retail |
| Industry | Food & Staples Retailing | Food & Staples Retailing |
| Size | Large | Large |
| ISIN | ZAE000005443 | CL0002132620 |
| Last update | 2026-04-02 | 2026-04-02 |
| History | ||
| 360 (V1) since 2023 | ||
| Ranks | ||
| 360 | 19 | 10 |
| Value | 54 | 55 |
| Quality | 30 | 42 |
| Growth | 53 | 32 |
| Safety | 29 | 18 |
| Sentiment | 49 | 52 |
| Quality details | ||
| Profitability | 23 | 30 |
| Cash Truth | 38 | 53 |
Pick n Pay Stores vs PepkorPick n Pay Stores vs ShopritePick n Pay Stores vs Boxer RetailPick n Pay Stores vs ClicksAdd a third stock →
Full analyses: Pick n Pay Stores · SMU
Make Sense of the Ranks
Every rank runs 1–100 against true peers. Higher is always better.
360° View
1 · Watch OutGood· 100
Value
1 · ExpensiveGood Value· 100
Quality
1 · Weak FundamentalsHigh Quality· 100
Growth
1 · Tough TimesHigh Growth· 100
Safety
1 · High LeverageWell-Financed· 100
Sentiment
1 · SkepticismPositive· 100