Compare · head to head
CJ Logistics vs Mitsubishi Logistics
Mitsubishi Logistics ranks higher overall — 360 rank 74 vs 69.
CJ Logistics leads on Value (63 vs 45) and Quality (49 vs 44). Mitsubishi Logistics leads on Safety (74 vs 43). The two are close on Growth and Sentiment.
Ranks as of 2026-06-12 · 1–100 vs true peers. Higher is better.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Profile | ||
| Country | South Korea | Japan |
| Sector | Transport & Logistics | Transport & Logistics |
| Industry | Air Freight & Logistics | Transportation Infrastructure |
| Size | Medium | Large |
| ISIN | KR7000120006 | JP3902000003 |
| Last update | 2026-04-02 | 2026-04-02 |
| History | ||
| 360 (V1) since 2023 | ||
| Ranks | ||
| 360 | 69 | 74 |
| Value | 63 | 45 |
| Quality | 49 | 44 |
| Growth | 56 | 53 |
| Safety | 43 | 74 |
| Sentiment | 58 | 58 |
| Quality details | ||
| Profitability | 38 | 46 |
| Cash Truth | 60 | 42 |
CJ Logistics vs EusuCJ Logistics vs MainfreightCJ Logistics vs T3EX Global HoldingsCJ Logistics vs Singapore PostAdd a third stock →
Full analyses: CJ Logistics · Mitsubishi Logistics
Make Sense of the Ranks
Every rank runs 1–100 against true peers. Higher is always better.
360° View
1 · Watch OutGood· 100
Value
1 · ExpensiveGood Value· 100
Quality
1 · Weak FundamentalsHigh Quality· 100
Growth
1 · Tough TimesHigh Growth· 100
Safety
1 · High LeverageWell-Financed· 100
Sentiment
1 · SkepticismPositive· 100