Compare · head to head
Hunting vs TechnipFMC
TechnipFMC ranks higher overall — 360 rank 80 vs 75.
Hunting leads on Value (54 vs 22) and Sentiment (56 vs 44). TechnipFMC leads on Quality (70 vs 45), Growth (70 vs 56) and Safety (75 vs 65).
Ranks as of 2026-06-12 · 1–100 vs true peers. Higher is better.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Profile | ||
| Country | UK | UK |
| Sector | Energy & Oil | Energy & Oil |
| Industry | Energy Equipment & Services | Energy Equipment & Services |
| Size | Medium | X-Large |
| ISIN | GB0004478896 | GB00BDSFG982 |
| Last update | 2026-04-02 | 2026-04-02 |
| History | ||
| 360 (V1) since 2023 | ||
| Ranks | ||
| 360 | 75 | 80 |
| Value | 54 | 22 |
| Quality | 45 | 70 |
| Growth | 56 | 70 |
| Safety | 65 | 75 |
| Sentiment | 56 | 44 |
| Quality details | ||
| Profitability | 43 | 84 |
| Cash Truth | 47 | 56 |
Full analyses: Hunting · TechnipFMC
Make Sense of the Ranks
Every rank runs 1–100 against true peers. Higher is always better.
360° View
1 · Watch OutGood· 100
Value
1 · ExpensiveGood Value· 100
Quality
1 · Weak FundamentalsHigh Quality· 100
Growth
1 · Tough TimesHigh Growth· 100
Safety
1 · High LeverageWell-Financed· 100
Sentiment
1 · SkepticismPositive· 100