Compare · head to head
Ebara vs Skellerup
Skellerup ranks higher overall — 360 rank 89 vs 18.
Skellerup leads on Quality (74 vs 25), Growth (64 vs 49) and Safety (69 vs 60). The two are close on Value and Sentiment.
Ranks as of 2026-06-12 · 1–100 vs true peers. Higher is better.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Profile | ||
| Country | Japan | New Zealand |
| Sector | Industrial Goods | Industrial Goods |
| Industry | Machinery | Machinery |
| Size | X-Large | Small |
| ISIN | JP3166000004 | NZSKXE0001S8 |
| Last update | 2026-04-02 | 2026-04-02 |
| History | ||
| 360 (V1) since 2023 | ||
| Ranks | ||
| 360 | 18 | 89 |
| Value | 38 | 42 |
| Quality | 25 | 74 |
| Growth | 49 | 64 |
| Safety | 60 | 69 |
| Sentiment | 41 | 43 |
| Quality details | ||
| Profitability | 42 | 91 |
| Cash Truth | 9 | 58 |
Ebara vs KinikEbara vs KanadeviaEbara vs Sumitomo Heavy IndustriesEbara vs TakumaAdd a third stock →
Full analyses: Ebara · Skellerup
Make Sense of the Ranks
Every rank runs 1–100 against true peers. Higher is always better.
360° View
1 · Watch OutGood· 100
Value
1 · ExpensiveGood Value· 100
Quality
1 · Weak FundamentalsHigh Quality· 100
Growth
1 · Tough TimesHigh Growth· 100
Safety
1 · High LeverageWell-Financed· 100
Sentiment
1 · SkepticismPositive· 100